MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.013

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of minimally invasive gynecology · 2014

Feasibility of resectoscopic operative hysteroscopy in a UK outpatient clinic using local anesthetic and traditional reusable equipment, with patient experiences and comparative cost analysis.

Penketh Richard J A, Bruen Elizabeth M, White Judith, Griffiths Anthony N, Patwardhan Asmita, Lindsay Peter, Hill Sarah, Carolan-Rees Grace

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVE

To assess procedural success, patient acceptability, and cost-saving potential of operative hysteroscopy using conventional equipment and local anesthetic in an outpatient clinic.

DESIGN

Feasibility study/service evaluation (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).

SETTING

Outpatient (office) clinic in a large UK teaching hospital.

PATIENTS: One hundred eighteen women with diagnosed or suspected intrauterine myomas or polyps.

INTERVENTIONS: Operative hysteroscopy (122 monopolar resection procedures using 8- or 10-mm diameter rigid resectoscopes with glycine solution for uterine irrigation) with the patient under local anesthesia in an outpatient (office) clinic.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS

Procedural success, duration of procedure, pathologic measurements, glycine irrigant deficit, patient pain scores and satisfaction, and comparative costs were recorded. Success of outpatient procedures was 90% (110 of 122 attempted), with a significantly reduced median procedure duration compared with a surgical setting using local (-7 minutes; p = .009) or general (-12.5 minutes; p < .001) anesthetic. Glycine irrigant absorption was low (median deficit, 0 mL), and no deficit was observed in 81% of patients. Mean (SD) estimated disease volume was comparable to that of hysteroscopic resection procedures in a surgical setting (3.38 [5.09] cm(3)), and weight was 1.8 (1.84) g. Patients tolerated the procedure well and reported low pain scores (highest median periprocedure pain measurement was 1.25 of 10), and 7-day follow-up satisfaction responses were positive. Retrospective cost analysis demonstrated that operative resection in an outpatient clinic was less expensive than in a surgical setting using general anesthetic (-$1003) or local anaesthetic (-$234). Reduced staff costs were the primary reason for this saving.

CONCLUSIONS

Operative hysteroscopic resection of myomas and polyps is feasible and well tolerated by patients in an outpatient/office setting using local anaesthetic and conventional equipment. The outpatient procedure is less expensive and its duration is shorter than in a surgical setting.

Для цитирования: Penketh Richard J A, Bruen Elizabeth M, White Judith, Griffiths Anthony N, Patwardhan Asmita, Lindsay Peter, Hill Sarah, Carolan-Rees Grace. Feasibility of resectoscopic operative hysteroscopy in a UK outpatient clinic using local anesthetic and traditional reusable equipment, with patient experiences and comparative cost analysis.. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.013.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.