Intensive care medicine · 2011
Noninvasive ventilation through a helmet in postextubation hypoxemic patients: physiologic comparison between neurally adjusted ventilatory assist and pressure support ventilation.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cammarota Gianmaria, Olivieri Carlo, Costa Roberta, Vaschetto Rosanna, Colombo Davide, Turucz Emilia, Longhini Federico, Della Corte Francesco, Conti Giorgio, Navalesi Paolo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) has been shown to improve patient-ventilator interaction and reduce asynchronies in intubated patients, as opposed to pressure support ventilation (PSV). This is a short-term head-to-head physiologic comparison between PSV and NAVA in delivering noninvasive ventilation through a helmet (h-NIV), in patients with postextubation hypoxemic acute respiratory failure.
METHODS: Ten patients underwent three 20-min trials of h-NIV in PSV, NAVA, and PSV again. Arterial blood gases (ABGs) were assessed at the end of each trial. Diaphragm electrical activity (EAdi) and airway pressure (P (aw)) were recorded to derive neural and mechanical respiratory rate and timing, inspiratory (delay(TR-insp)) and expiratory trigger delays (delay(TR-exp)), time of synchrony between diaphragm contraction and ventilator assistance (time(synch)), and the asynchrony index (AI).
RESULTS: ABGs, peak EAdi, peak P (aw), respiratory rate, either neural or mechanical, neural timing, and delay(TR-exp) were not different between trials. Compared with PSV, with NAVA the mechanical expiratory time was significantly shorter, while the inspiratory time and duty cycle were greater. Time(synch) was 0.79 ± 0.35 s in NAVA versus 0.60 ± 0.30 s and 0.55 ± 0.29 s during the PSV trials (p < 0.01 for both). AI exceeded 10% during both PSV trials, while not in NAVA (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PSV, NAVA improves patient-ventilator interaction and synchrony, with no difference in gas exchange, respiratory rate, and neural drive and timing.
METHODS: Ten patients underwent three 20-min trials of h-NIV in PSV, NAVA, and PSV again. Arterial blood gases (ABGs) were assessed at the end of each trial. Diaphragm electrical activity (EAdi) and airway pressure (P (aw)) were recorded to derive neural and mechanical respiratory rate and timing, inspiratory (delay(TR-insp)) and expiratory trigger delays (delay(TR-exp)), time of synchrony between diaphragm contraction and ventilator assistance (time(synch)), and the asynchrony index (AI).
RESULTS: ABGs, peak EAdi, peak P (aw), respiratory rate, either neural or mechanical, neural timing, and delay(TR-exp) were not different between trials. Compared with PSV, with NAVA the mechanical expiratory time was significantly shorter, while the inspiratory time and duty cycle were greater. Time(synch) was 0.79 ± 0.35 s in NAVA versus 0.60 ± 0.30 s and 0.55 ± 0.29 s during the PSV trials (p < 0.01 for both). AI exceeded 10% during both PSV trials, while not in NAVA (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with PSV, NAVA improves patient-ventilator interaction and synchrony, with no difference in gas exchange, respiratory rate, and neural drive and timing.