The British journal of surgery · 1995
Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstruction.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Seow-Choen F, Goh H S
Аннотация
Twenty patients (13 men) with low rectal cancer, median (range) age 64.5 (38-83) years were prospectively randomized to undergo ultra-low anterior resection with a J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis (median (range) distance of anastomosis from the anal verge 3 (1-4) cm). Another 20 patients (15 men), median (range) age 62.5 (44-86) years) with low rectal cancer were randomized to a straight coloanal anastomosis (median (range) distance of anastomosis from the anal verge 3.25 (2-5) cm). There were no significant differences in operative time or complications between the two groups. There was significantly better postoperative anal function in patients who underwent pouch-anal anastomosis at 1, 6 and 12 months after ileostomy closure. At 12 months all patients (19 of 19) with a pouch reconstruction had regained normal continence compared with 14 of 20 of those who had a straight coloanal anastomosis. No patient complained of severe constipation requiring enema or intubation to evacuate.