MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.12.015

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2006

Characteristics of lacrimo-auriculo-dento-digital (LADD) syndrome: case report of a family and literature review.

Inan Umit Ubeyt, Yilmaz Mustafa Deniz, Demir Yavuz, Degirmenci Bumin, Ermis Sitki Samet, Ozturk Faruk

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We describe a family with lacrimo-auriculo-dento-digital syndrome (LADD). A 13-year-old boy had cup-shaped ears, deafness, unilateral choanal atresia, bilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction, xerostomia, alacrima due to congenital absence of lacrimal glands, agenesis of salivary glands, chronic dacryocystitis, keratoconjunctivitis sicca, ptosis, nail dysplasia of the thumb, shortness of fifth toe, temporal bone abnormality and epilepsy. His younger sister had shortened middle phalanx of fifth digits. His middle sister had hypodontia, shortened distal phalanx of fifth digit, agenesis of salivary glands, mild hearing loss and exotropia. His older sister had left nasolacrimal duct obstruction and aplasia of both parotid glands. The oldest sister had hypodontia and divergent excess exotropia. His mother had hypodontia. These findings are consistent with LADD syndrome. An autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance with variable expressivity has been demonstrated. Renal and uro-genital anomalies have been noted variably.

Для цитирования: Inan Umit Ubeyt, Yilmaz Mustafa Deniz, Demir Yavuz, Degirmenci Bumin, Ermis Sitki Samet, Ozturk Faruk. Characteristics of lacrimo-auriculo-dento-digital (LADD) syndrome: case report of a family and literature review.. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.12.015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.