Economic burden of non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia in the United States.

OBJECTIVES

To assess all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among patients with α- or β-non-transfusion-dependent thalassemia (NTDT) vs. matched controls in the United States.

METHODS

Adults with ≥1 inpatient setting or ≥2 outpatient settings claims for α- or β‑thalassemia between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2021 were identified from the Merative MarketScan Commercial/Medicare database. Patients with <8 transfusions or ≥6 weeks between any two adjacent transfusions in a 1-year period post-index date (date of first observed α- or β-thalassemia diagnosis code) were considered to have NTDT. Patients were required to have mean hemoglobin (Hgb) levels <10 g/dL during follow-up as an additional measure to ensure exclusion of patients with thalassemia trait. Each patient was matched with five controls based on age, sex, length of follow-up, availability of lab data, and payer type. All-cause HCRU and costs were assessed over ≥12 months post-index. Data were also analyzed for the non-transfusion-dependent α- and β-thalassemia subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 149 patients with NTDT and Hgb levels <10 g/dL were matched with 745 controls. The mean follow-up period was approximately 3 years. All-cause inpatient admissions (48.3% vs. 16.5%; p < 0.001) and emergency room visits (61.1% vs. 39.1%; p < 0.001) during follow-up were higher with NTDT vs. controls, and total costs (total medical + outpatient pharmacy) were $29,107 per patient per year (PPPY) in patients with NTDT vs. $9,042 PPPY in controls (p < 0.001). Similar trends were seen in the subgroups of patients with non-transfusion-dependent α- and β-thalassemia vs. matched controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with NTDT in the United States, including those with α- and β-thalassemia, have significantly higher all-cause HCRU and costs vs. matched controls. There is a need for effective treatment options to reduce the healthcare burden of NTDT and improve patient outcomes.