The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2005
CCR 4 and CCR 5 expression in conjunctival specimens as differential markers of T(H)1/ T(H)2 in ocular surface disorders.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Baudouin Christophe, Liang Hong, Bremond-Gignac Dominique, Hamard Pascale, Hreiche Raymond, Creuzot-Garcher Catherine, Warnet Jean-Michel, Brignole-Baudouin Françoise
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Accurate inflammatory mechanisms in chronic ocular surface diseases (OSDs) cannot routinely be assessed. New techniques for investigating ocular surface inflammatory pathways are of major importance.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the expressions of CCR 4 and CCR 5, known to be related to the T(H)2 and T(H)1 systems, respectively, and HLA-DR in conjunctival impression cytology specimens from patients with chronic OSDs.
METHODS: In this case-controlled study, impression cytology specimens were taken in a series of patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (n=21), giant papillary conjunctivitis (n=6), or keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS; n=17), or receiving topical antiglaucoma treatments (n=31), and from 20 normal subjects. Conjunctival cells were incubated with mAbs to CCR 4, CCR 5, CD45, and HLA-DR to quantify conjunctival inflammation in a masked manner using flow cytometry.
RESULTS: HLA-DR was higher in the glaucoma and KCS groups than in allergic and normal eyes. CCR 4 was overexpressed in allergy and glaucoma, whereas CCR 5 was higher in the KCS and glaucomatous groups. CD45 was expressed by only few cells in all groups, with almost no significant differences. CCR 4 expression was negatively correlated with CCR 5 and HLA-DR, whereas CCR 5 was positively correlated with HLA-DR.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms the overexpression of chemokine receptors by the conjunctival epithelium in OSDs. CCR 4 and CCR 5 expression may vary according to the immune pathway involved. Accurate mechanisms in ocular surface inflammatory reactions-that is, those related to the T(H)1 or T(H)2 systems-could be differentiated by CCR 4/CCR 5 profiles. Our results also suggest that long-term use of topical treatments may stimulate both systems.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the expressions of CCR 4 and CCR 5, known to be related to the T(H)2 and T(H)1 systems, respectively, and HLA-DR in conjunctival impression cytology specimens from patients with chronic OSDs.
METHODS: In this case-controlled study, impression cytology specimens were taken in a series of patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis (n=21), giant papillary conjunctivitis (n=6), or keratoconjunctivitis sicca (KCS; n=17), or receiving topical antiglaucoma treatments (n=31), and from 20 normal subjects. Conjunctival cells were incubated with mAbs to CCR 4, CCR 5, CD45, and HLA-DR to quantify conjunctival inflammation in a masked manner using flow cytometry.
RESULTS: HLA-DR was higher in the glaucoma and KCS groups than in allergic and normal eyes. CCR 4 was overexpressed in allergy and glaucoma, whereas CCR 5 was higher in the KCS and glaucomatous groups. CD45 was expressed by only few cells in all groups, with almost no significant differences. CCR 4 expression was negatively correlated with CCR 5 and HLA-DR, whereas CCR 5 was positively correlated with HLA-DR.
CONCLUSION: This study confirms the overexpression of chemokine receptors by the conjunctival epithelium in OSDs. CCR 4 and CCR 5 expression may vary according to the immune pathway involved. Accurate mechanisms in ocular surface inflammatory reactions-that is, those related to the T(H)1 or T(H)2 systems-could be differentiated by CCR 4/CCR 5 profiles. Our results also suggest that long-term use of topical treatments may stimulate both systems.