DOI 10.1080/02656736.2019.1649475
Ultrasound-guided laser ablation versus surgery for solitary papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: a retrospective study.
Аннотация
Objectives
To compare the clinical outcomes of ultrasound-guided laser ablation (LA) and surgery for treatment of solitary papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC).
Methods
A total of 81 consecutive patients with solitary PTMC were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 36 received LA and 45 underwent surgery. Surgery was performed by hemithyroidectomy with unilateral central neck dissection. The follow-up consisted of a physical examination, neck ultrasonography, chest X-ray or CT scan and thyroid function tests. The procedure time, hospital stay, complication and recurrence rates were compared between the two groups after treatment.
Results
The follow-up period for the LA and surgical group were 49.2 ± 4.5 months (range, 30-54 months) and 48.5 ± 6.2 months (range, 24-54 months), respectively. The mean hospital stay and procedure time in the LA group were shorter than those in the surgical group. After LA, the largest diameter and average volume decreased from 4.7 ± 1.4 mm to 0.2 ± 0.8 mm, and from 43.2 ± 38.8 mm3 to 0.7 ± 4.1 mm3 (p < .05 for both), respectively. The complication rates and recurrence rates did not differ between the LA group (2.8% [1 of 36] and 5.6% [2 of 36]) and the surgical group (6.7% [3 of 45] and 6.7% [3 of 45]) (p > .05 for both). No distant metastasis occurred in the either group during the follow-up period.
Conclusions
Compared with hemithyroidectomy with unilateral central neck dissection, ultrasound-guided LA was also a safe and effective therapy for treating solitary PTMC, and it may be considered as a treatment alternative for patients who are ineligible or refusal to undergo surgery.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.