Acta clinica Belgica · 2021
Next generation sequencing in therapy-related myeloid neoplasms compared to de novo myeloid neoplasms.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Claerhout Helena, Vranckx Hilde, Lierman Els, Michaux Lucienne, Boeckx Nancy
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) are frequently categorized according to previous therapy or pattern of cytogenetic abnormalities. Our objective was to evaluate and compare the mutational profile of de novo and t-MN by next generation sequencing.
METHODS: Sixty-four samples from patients with t-MN, previously treated for a solid tumor (mainly breast), or de novo AML, MDS, MDS/MPN were selected for our study. The library was prepared using diagnostic samples and the TruSight Myeloid sequencing panel targeting 54 genes. Samples were sequenced on a MiSeq. The classification system of the Belgian ComPerMed Expert Panel was used for the biological variant classification.
RESULTS: Taking only pathogenic, probably pathogenic variants and variants of unknown significance into account 141 variants in 33 genes were found in 52 of 64 samples (81%; mean number of variants per patient = 2; range = [1-11]; 67 variants in 25 genes in t-MN and 74 variants in 25 genes in de novo MN). Overall, the most frequently detected variants included TET2 (n = 22), TP53 (n = 12), DNMT3A (n = 10) and FLT3, NPM1, RUNX1 (n = 8 each).
CONCLUSION: Our study revealed a high variety of variants both in t-MN and de novo MN patients. There was a higher incidence of FLT3 and TP53 variants in t-MN compared to de novo MN.
METHODS: Sixty-four samples from patients with t-MN, previously treated for a solid tumor (mainly breast), or de novo AML, MDS, MDS/MPN were selected for our study. The library was prepared using diagnostic samples and the TruSight Myeloid sequencing panel targeting 54 genes. Samples were sequenced on a MiSeq. The classification system of the Belgian ComPerMed Expert Panel was used for the biological variant classification.
RESULTS: Taking only pathogenic, probably pathogenic variants and variants of unknown significance into account 141 variants in 33 genes were found in 52 of 64 samples (81%; mean number of variants per patient = 2; range = [1-11]; 67 variants in 25 genes in t-MN and 74 variants in 25 genes in de novo MN). Overall, the most frequently detected variants included TET2 (n = 22), TP53 (n = 12), DNMT3A (n = 10) and FLT3, NPM1, RUNX1 (n = 8 each).
CONCLUSION: Our study revealed a high variety of variants both in t-MN and de novo MN patients. There was a higher incidence of FLT3 and TP53 variants in t-MN compared to de novo MN.