MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.joco.2016.10.001

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of current ophthalmology · 2016

Mesopic visual quality after accelerated corneal cross linking: A 12-month follow-up study.

Hashemi Hassan, Asgari Soheila

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To determine the 1-year changes of mesopic higher order aberrations (HOAs) and contrast sensitivity (CS) after accelerated corneal cross linking (CXL) in progressive keratoconus.

METHODS

In this prospective case series, 70 eyes of 62 keratoconic patients underwent accelerated CXL (18 mW/cm2, 5 min). HOAs and CS were measured using the OPD Scan III and CSV-1000 CS test charts under mesopic conditions before and 6 and 12 months after CXL.

RESULTS

At 1 year, logarithmic mesopic CS in spatial frequencies of 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree (CPD) had increased by 0.05 ± 0.29 (P = 0.029), 0.04 ± 0.88 (P = 0.012), 0.27 ± 0.46 (P = 0.172), and 0.06 ± 0.22 (P = 0.020), respectively. The decrease in ocular HOAs (0.10 ± 0.69 μm, P = 0.992) [coma (0.08 ± 1.01 μm, P = 0.613), trefoil (0.03 ± 0.37 μm, P = 0.659), and spherical aberration (SA) (0.10 ± 0.59 μm, P = 0.743)] and corneal HOAs (0.40 ± 1.69 μm, P = 0.874) [coma (0.39 ± 1.59 μm, P = 0.401), trefoil (0.33 ± 2.16 μm, P = 0.368), and SA (1.27 ± 1.14 μm, P = 0.354)] were not statistically significant. The correlations between mesopic CS and HOAs were weak before and after CXL.

CONCLUSION

One year after accelerated CXL, CS significantly improved, but changes in HOAs were statistically insignificant. CS changes were independent of HOAs.

Для цитирования: Hashemi Hassan, Asgari Soheila. Mesopic visual quality after accelerated corneal cross linking: A 12-month follow-up study.. Journal of current ophthalmology. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.joco.2016.10.001.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.