European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society · 2022
Development and effects of a post-traumatic growth program for patients with breast cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Choi Sung Hee, Lee Young Whee, Kim Hwa Soon, Kim Soo Hyun, Lee Eun-Hyun, Park Eun Young, Cho Young Up
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a post-traumatic growth (PTG) program, based on the PTG promotion resources suggested by Cahlhoun, Cann, and Tedeschi, and to apply it to breast cancer patients to determine its effect.
METHODS: A non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest experimental design was used. In total, 74 participants were enrolled in this study, with 37 in the experimental group and 37 in the control group. The PTG program developed in this study consisted of writing and self-reflection for self-analysis, talking and sharing for self-disclosure, and participation in a self-help group for social support. The instruments used for this study were the Korean version of the Event Related Rumination Inventory, the Korean version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Korean version of the Post-traumatic Growth Inventory. The data were analyzed with the χ2test, t-test, Fisher's exact test and all analysis were conducted based on an intention-to-treat principle.
RESULTS: The experimental group that underwent a PTG program had a lower emotional distress score than the control group (anxiety: t = -3.84, p = .001; depression: t = -3.22, p = .002). The experimental group had a lower intrusive rumination (t = -3.55, p = .001) and had higher deliberate rumination score than the control group (t = 2.10, p = .039). The experimental group had a higher PTG score than the control group (t = 2.34, p = .022).
CONCLUSIONS: The PTG program developed in this study for breast cancer patients has the potential to contribute to the promotion of PTG in breast cancer patients.
METHODS: A non-equivalent control group pretest-posttest experimental design was used. In total, 74 participants were enrolled in this study, with 37 in the experimental group and 37 in the control group. The PTG program developed in this study consisted of writing and self-reflection for self-analysis, talking and sharing for self-disclosure, and participation in a self-help group for social support. The instruments used for this study were the Korean version of the Event Related Rumination Inventory, the Korean version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Korean version of the Post-traumatic Growth Inventory. The data were analyzed with the χ2test, t-test, Fisher's exact test and all analysis were conducted based on an intention-to-treat principle.
RESULTS: The experimental group that underwent a PTG program had a lower emotional distress score than the control group (anxiety: t = -3.84, p = .001; depression: t = -3.22, p = .002). The experimental group had a lower intrusive rumination (t = -3.55, p = .001) and had higher deliberate rumination score than the control group (t = 2.10, p = .039). The experimental group had a higher PTG score than the control group (t = 2.34, p = .022).
CONCLUSIONS: The PTG program developed in this study for breast cancer patients has the potential to contribute to the promotion of PTG in breast cancer patients.