MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/00332941221074258

Медицинская библиотека · Psychological reports · 2022

Exploring Working Memory, Self-Criticism, and Rumination as Factors Related to Self-Harm.

Carpenter Rachel K, Alloway Tracy Packiam

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The prevalence of self-harm and the relative emotional influences are well understood, but certain cognitive factors such as working memory, rumination, and self-criticism are not fully explored. The aim of the current study is to examine specific aspects of cognition to explore their influence on self-harming behaviors. Participants included 101 undergraduates from a British University. Factors were measured using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, the Depressive Experiences Questionnaire, Ruminative Response Scale, and the Automated Working Memory Assessment. Findings indicated a greater incidence of self-harming behaviors among those who demonstrated higher depressive symptoms, but depression scores were not significantly related to self-harm. Additionally, a binary logistic regression indicated that self-criticism was associated with the presence of self-harming behavior, and a Classification and Regression Trees found that the single strongest predictor of self-harming behavior was a belief that love needs to be continually earned from others. Incorporating treatments that reduce self-criticism, such as improving self-compassion with Compassionate Mind Training, may address underlying mechanisms that trigger self-harm behavior.

Для цитирования: Carpenter Rachel K, Alloway Tracy Packiam. Exploring Working Memory, Self-Criticism, and Rumination as Factors Related to Self-Harm.. Psychological reports. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/00332941221074258.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.