MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104523

Медицинская библиотека · Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022

Understanding associations between rumination and inflammation: A scoping review.

Szabo Yvette Z, Burns Christina M, Lantrip Crystal

СтатьяПоддержка правительства СШАScoping ReviewПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

A growing body of evidence suggests that rumination, or focused attention on mental representations of negative events, may have physiological consequences that adversely affect long term health. We conducted a scoping review on quantitative studies of humans examining associations between rumination and inflammation, which included 13 studies representing 14 samples and 1,102 unique participants. The review included 8 biomarkers measured in plasma, serum and saliva (C reactive protein, and C-C motif chemokine 11, interleukin (IL)- 1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10 and tumor necrosis factor alpha). More consistent findings of an association between greater rumination and increased inflammation were found in studies that used experimental designs and manipulated rumination. Emerging research suggests rumination may interact with other factors (e.g., socioeconomic status, anxiety) to predict inflammation. This review offers an up to date synthesis of the emerging research focused on rumination and inflammation. The relationship between inflammation and rumination may be contingent on how rumination is conceptualized and measured, as well as the measure of inflammation (i.e., at rest/ in response to stress).

Для цитирования: Szabo Yvette Z, Burns Christina M, Lantrip Crystal. Understanding associations between rumination and inflammation: A scoping review.. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104523.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.