Critical care (London, England) · 2004
Effects of the components of positive airway pressure on work of breathing during bronchospasm.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Miro Adelaida M, Pinsky Michael R, Rogers Paul L
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Partial assist ventilation reduces work of breathing in patients with bronchospasm; however, it is not clear which components of the ventilatory cycle contribute to this process. Theoretically, expiratory positive airway pressure (EPAP), by reducing expiratory breaking, may be as important as inspiratory positive airway pressure (IPAP) in reducing work of breathing during acute bronchospasm.
METHOD: We compared the effects of 10 cmH2O of IPAP, EPAP, and continuous positive airwaypressure (CPAP) on inspiratory work of breathing and end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) in a canine model of methacholine-induced bronchospasm.
RESULTS: Methacholine infusion increased airway resistance and work of breathing. During bronchospasm IPAP and CPAP reduced work of breathing primarily through reductions in transdiaphragmatic pressure per tidal volume (from 69.4 +/- 10.8 cmH2O/l to 45.6 +/- 5.9 cmH2O/l and to 36.9 +/- 4.6 cmH2O/l, respectively; P < 0.05) and in diaphragmatic pressure-time product (from 306 +/- 31 to 268 +/- 25 and to 224 +/- 23, respectively; P < 0.05). Pleural pressure indices of work of breathing were not reduced by IPAP and CPAP. EPAP significantly increased all pleural and transdiaphragmatic work of breathing indices. CPAP and EPAP similarly increased EELV above control by 93 +/- 16 ml and 69 +/- 12 ml, respectively. The increase in EELV by IPAP of 48 +/- 8 ml (P < 0.01) was significantly less than that by CPAP and EPAP.
CONCLUSION: The reduction in work of breathing during bronchospasm is primarily induced by the IPAP component, and that for the same reduction in work of breathing by CPAP, EELV increases more.
METHOD: We compared the effects of 10 cmH2O of IPAP, EPAP, and continuous positive airwaypressure (CPAP) on inspiratory work of breathing and end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) in a canine model of methacholine-induced bronchospasm.
RESULTS: Methacholine infusion increased airway resistance and work of breathing. During bronchospasm IPAP and CPAP reduced work of breathing primarily through reductions in transdiaphragmatic pressure per tidal volume (from 69.4 +/- 10.8 cmH2O/l to 45.6 +/- 5.9 cmH2O/l and to 36.9 +/- 4.6 cmH2O/l, respectively; P < 0.05) and in diaphragmatic pressure-time product (from 306 +/- 31 to 268 +/- 25 and to 224 +/- 23, respectively; P < 0.05). Pleural pressure indices of work of breathing were not reduced by IPAP and CPAP. EPAP significantly increased all pleural and transdiaphragmatic work of breathing indices. CPAP and EPAP similarly increased EELV above control by 93 +/- 16 ml and 69 +/- 12 ml, respectively. The increase in EELV by IPAP of 48 +/- 8 ml (P < 0.01) was significantly less than that by CPAP and EPAP.
CONCLUSION: The reduction in work of breathing during bronchospasm is primarily induced by the IPAP component, and that for the same reduction in work of breathing by CPAP, EELV increases more.