MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0190-9622(99)70442-1

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 1999

Experimentally induced chronic irritant contact dermatitis to evaluate the efficacy of protective creams in vivo.

Wigger-Alberti W, Caduff L, Burg G, Elsner P

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Widely accepted in vivo models to evaluate the efficacy of protective creams (PCs) are still missing.

OBJECTIVE

The effect of petrolatum's ability to protect against irritation was tested in a repetitive irritation test to optimize the concentration of irritants against which PCs are tested and to evaluate the necessary cumulative application time.

METHODS

On 20 healthy volunteers, the irritants (sodium lauryl sulfate 5% vs 10%, sodium hydroxide 0.5% vs 1%, lactic acid 20% vs 30%, and toluene undiluted) were applied daily for 2 weeks on the ventral forearms after 30 minutes of pretreatment with petrolatum. The irritant cutaneous reactions were quantified by erythema score, transepidermal water loss, and chromametry.

RESULTS

For petrolatum, a significant protective effect was obtained against irritation by sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium hydroxide, and toluene in different degrees. Less efficacy was observed against lactic acid.

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that a 1-week period of cumulative irritation is enough to evaluate the efficacy of PCs against most irritants, even if lower concentrations of irritants are used.

Для цитирования: Wigger-Alberti W, Caduff L, Burg G, Elsner P. Experimentally induced chronic irritant contact dermatitis to evaluate the efficacy of protective creams in vivo.. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 1999. DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(99)70442-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.