The relationship between major depressive disorder and dementia: A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Major depressive disorder (MDD) and dementia psychiatric and neurological diseases that are clinically widespread, but whether there is a causal link between them is still unclear. In this study, bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) was used to investigate the potential causal relationship between MDD and dementia via a genome-wide association study (GWAS) database, containing samples from the European population.
METHOD: We collected data on MDD and common clinical dementia subtypes from GWAS, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), Parkinson's disease with dementia (PDD), and vascular dementia (VaD). A series of bidirectional two-sample MR studies and correlation sensitivity analysis were carried out.
RESULTS
In the study of the effect of MDD on dementia subtypes, no causal relationship was found between MDD and dementia subtypes other than VaD, inverse variance weighted (IVW) method: odds ratio (OR), 2.131; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.249-3.639, P = 0.006; MDD-AD: OR, 1.000; 95 % CI, 0.999-1.001, P = 0.537; MDD-FTD: OR, 1.476; 95 % CI, 0.471-4.627, P = 0.505; MDD-PDD: OR, 0.592; 95 % CI, 0.204-1.718, P = 0.335; MR-Egger method: MDD-DLB: OR, 0.582; 95 % CI, 0.021-15.962, P = 0.751. In reverse MR analyses, no dementia subtype was found to be a risk factor for MDD.
LIMITATIONS: The results of this study may not be generalizable to non-European populations.
CONCLUSION
MDD was identified as a potential risk factor for VaD, but no dementia subtype was found to be a risk factor for MDD. These results suggest a new avenue for the prevention of VaD.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.