DOI 10.1016/j.jcjo.2014.11.006
Topical glaucoma therapy and ocular surface disease: a prospective, controlled cohort study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the association between the intensity and duration of glaucoma topical therapy and severity of signs and symptoms of ocular surface disease (OSD).
DESIGN
Single-site, prospective, controlled, cross-sectional study.
PARTICIPANTS
Sixty-one patients with no diagnosis of or previous treatment for OSD were identified.
METHODS
Patients were assigned to 2 groups: the glaucoma group with 31 patients diagnosed with primary open-angle glaucoma and using at least 1 topical intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering medication and the control group including 30 patients with no diagnosis of glaucoma or history of topical therapy usage. The right eye of each patient was arbitrarily chosen. Each patient completed an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire and underwent evaluation of the ocular surface by conjunctival and corneal lissamine green (LG) staining and tear breakup time (TBUT). The intensity index (drops/wk × therapy duration in years) was calculated to quantify the topical therapy.
RESULTS
OSDI scores of the glaucoma group correlated to the intensity index (r = 0.46, CI 0.13-0.69). The glaucoma group had a higher mean OSDI score than the control group (18.97 ± 9.5 versus 6.25 ± 5.7, p = 5.85E-08). Abnormal TBUT and LG staining scores were prevalent in the glaucoma group compared with the control group (68% vs 17%, p = 0.000078; 65% vs 3%, p = 2.9E-07).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients on glaucoma therapy have a greater prevalence of OSD symptoms, and their intensity index correlates to the OSDI score. The intensity index reflects quantitatively the amount of treatment and can be further validated in future studies as a predicting tool for OSD development.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.