Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2013
Management of penetrating injuries of the upper extremities.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Van Waes Oscar J F, Navsaria Pradeep H, Verschuren Renske C M, Vroon Laurens C, Van Lieshout Esther M M, Halm Jens A, Nicol Andrew J, Vermeulen Jefrey
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Routine surgical exploration after penetrating upper extremity trauma (PUET) to exclude arterial injury leads to a large number of negative explorations and iatrogenic injuries. Selective non-operative management (SNOM) is gaining in favor for patients with PUET. The present study was undertaken to assess the validity of SNOM in PUET and to present a practical management algorithm.
METHODS: All consecutive patients presenting to a tertiary referral center following PUET were included in this prospective observational cohort study. Patients were managed along Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS©) guidelines, and based on clinical manifestations, either underwent emergency surgery or were treated conservatively with or without additional diagnostic investigations. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) was indicated by a preset protocol based on the physical examination.
RESULTS: During the four-month study period, 161 patients with PUET were admitted. Sixteen (9.9%) patients underwent emergency surgery, revealing 14 vascular injuries. Another 8 (5.0%) patients underwent vascular exploration following CTA. The remaining patients (n=137) were managed non-operatively for vascular matters. Eighteen (11.2%) patients required semi-elective surgical intervention for fractures or nerve injuries. During the follow- up, no missed vascular injuries were detected.
CONCLUSION: Neither routine exploration nor routine CTA is indicated after PUET. Stable patients should undergo additional investigation based on clinical findings only. SNOM is a feasible and safe strategy after PUET.
METHODS: All consecutive patients presenting to a tertiary referral center following PUET were included in this prospective observational cohort study. Patients were managed along Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS©) guidelines, and based on clinical manifestations, either underwent emergency surgery or were treated conservatively with or without additional diagnostic investigations. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) was indicated by a preset protocol based on the physical examination.
RESULTS: During the four-month study period, 161 patients with PUET were admitted. Sixteen (9.9%) patients underwent emergency surgery, revealing 14 vascular injuries. Another 8 (5.0%) patients underwent vascular exploration following CTA. The remaining patients (n=137) were managed non-operatively for vascular matters. Eighteen (11.2%) patients required semi-elective surgical intervention for fractures or nerve injuries. During the follow- up, no missed vascular injuries were detected.
CONCLUSION: Neither routine exploration nor routine CTA is indicated after PUET. Stable patients should undergo additional investigation based on clinical findings only. SNOM is a feasible and safe strategy after PUET.