MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1159/000444246

Медицинская библиотека · Blood purification · 2016

UK National Survey of Practice Patterns of Fluid Volume Management in Haemodialysis Patients: A Need for Evidence.

Dasgupta Indranil, Farrington Ken, Davies Simon J, Davenport Andrew, Mitra Sandip

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Fluid management in haemodialysis (HD) affects patient experience, morbidity and mortality. Standards for best practice are lacking. A national survey of the United Kingdom was undertaken to define prevalent practice.

METHODS

An online questionnaire was distributed to all UK renal centres.

RESULTS

Forty-five of 74 centres (173 dialysis units), serving 62% (n = 14,697) of UK HD population responded. Seventy-eight per cent had no agreed policy for managing fluid balance in patients on HD; 44% did not assess fluid status routinely. Clinical assessment was the norm; 27% used bio-impedance-based device. To achieve a target-weight, 53% reduced weight as far as tolerated. Twenty-two per cent measured residual renal function (RRF). Ninety-one per cent had no policy for fluid overload. Sixty-four per cent restricted salt and water. Ninety-three per cent used diuretics in patients with RRF. Thirty-eight per cent felt management was adequate; 77% felt there was a need for better evidence. Ninety-one per cent would participate in a study addressing this.

CONCLUSION

There is an urgent need for establishing an evidence base on the optimal approaches to fluid management.

Для цитирования: Dasgupta Indranil, Farrington Ken, Davies Simon J, Davenport Andrew, Mitra Sandip. UK National Survey of Practice Patterns of Fluid Volume Management in Haemodialysis Patients: A Need for Evidence.. Blood purification. 2016. DOI: 10.1159/000444246.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.