MedElevator
Войти в исследования Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2017
Aspheric versus wavefront-guided aspheric photorefractive keratectomy in eyes with significant astigmatism.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Faramarzi Amir, Moshirfar Majid, Karimian Farid, Delfazayebaher Siamak, Kheiri Bahareh
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the refractive and higher-order aberrations (HOAs) outcomes after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in patients with significant astigmatism using aspheric versus wavefront-guided aspheric profiles.
SETTING: Ophthalmic Research Center and Department of Ophthalmology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Negah Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized case series.
METHODS: One eye of each patient with a refractive astigmatism more than 2.00 diopters (D) randomly received aspheric PRK. In the other eye, wavefront-guided and aspheric treatment was performed using a personalized treatment advanced algorithm. Visual acuity, refractive errors, and HOAs were compared between the 2 groups preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: The study comprised 32 patients (64 eyes). The mean preoperative refractive astigmatism was -4.07 D ± 1.64 (SD) and -4.02 ± 1.55 D in the aspheric group and wavefront-guided aspheric group, respectively (P = .2). The mean postoperative astigmatism was -0.46 ± 0.37 D and -0.82 ± 0.53 D in the aspheric group and wavefront-guided aspheric group, respectively (P = .02). Postoperatively, the root mean square of total HOAs was significantly increased in both groups. However, compared with wavefront-guided aspheric PRK, aspheric PRK induced fewer HOAs (P = .003).
CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with high astigmatism, post-PRK residual astigmatism was lower in the aspheric group than in the wavefront-guided aspheric group. The increase in HOAs was significantly higher in the wavefront-guided aspheric group than in the aspheric group.
SETTING: Ophthalmic Research Center and Department of Ophthalmology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Negah Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized case series.
METHODS: One eye of each patient with a refractive astigmatism more than 2.00 diopters (D) randomly received aspheric PRK. In the other eye, wavefront-guided and aspheric treatment was performed using a personalized treatment advanced algorithm. Visual acuity, refractive errors, and HOAs were compared between the 2 groups preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: The study comprised 32 patients (64 eyes). The mean preoperative refractive astigmatism was -4.07 D ± 1.64 (SD) and -4.02 ± 1.55 D in the aspheric group and wavefront-guided aspheric group, respectively (P = .2). The mean postoperative astigmatism was -0.46 ± 0.37 D and -0.82 ± 0.53 D in the aspheric group and wavefront-guided aspheric group, respectively (P = .02). Postoperatively, the root mean square of total HOAs was significantly increased in both groups. However, compared with wavefront-guided aspheric PRK, aspheric PRK induced fewer HOAs (P = .003).
CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with high astigmatism, post-PRK residual astigmatism was lower in the aspheric group than in the wavefront-guided aspheric group. The increase in HOAs was significantly higher in the wavefront-guided aspheric group than in the aspheric group.