Clinical outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis with an aberration-neutral profile centered on the corneal vertex comparing vector planning with manifest refraction planning for the treatment of myopic astigmatism.

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with an aberration-neutral profile centered on the estimated visual axis (considering 70% of the pupil offset toward the corneal vertex) comparing vector planning with manifest refraction planning for the treatment of myopic astigmatism.

SETTING

Muscat Eye Laser Center, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman, Muscat, Oman.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

The outcomes were evaluated at a 6-month follow-up in eyes showing ocular residual astigmatism (ORA) over 0.75 diopters (D) preoperatively.

RESULTS

Eighty-five treatments were based on manifest astigmatism (preoperative sphere -2.11 D ± 1.3 [SD], cylinder -0.90 ± 1.0 D), and 79 treatments were based on vector planning (preoperative sphere -2.46 ± 1.5 D, cylinder -0.78 ± 0.79 D). At a 6-month follow-up, 128 patients (164 eyes) were evaluated and no significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of difference between corrected distance visual acuity and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) (P = .1, t test and Fisher exact test Snellen lines 1 or better, P = .4) and postoperative UDVA (P = .05, t test and Fisher exact test for UDVA 20/16 or better, P = .3). Significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of achieved spherical equivalent (P = .04), corneal toricity, and ORA (P < .001, t test and Fisher exact test for ORA ≤0.75 D, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Performing LASIK for myopic astigmatism with the vector planning approach resulted in comparable visual outcomes to manifest refraction planning.