DOI 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.03.036
Photorefractive intrastromal corneal crosslinking for the treatment of myopic refractive errors: Six-month interim findings.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of photorefractive intrastromal corneal crosslinking (CXL) in low myopia.
SETTING
Ruhr University Eye Hospital, Bochum, Germany.
DESIGN
Prospective case series.
METHODS
Healthy eyes with myopia or myopic astigmatism had photorefractive intrastromal CXL using the Mosaic system to apply ultraviolet-A (UVA) 365 nm (30 mW/cm2) irradiance (total calculated UVA dose of 10 J/cm2 or 15 J/cm2) with riboflavin 0.1% solution. Efficacy was determined by the change in the manifest refraction spherical equivalent (MRSE), uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and corneal curvature. Safety was determined by the corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), slitlamp biomicroscopy, endothelial cell count, and adverse events.
RESULTS
Twenty-six eyes of 14 patients with a mean age of 30.8 years ± 9.3 (SD) were included. There were statistically significant improvements in UDVA 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively (all P < .001). A significant improvement in CDVA was observed (P = .02). Improvements in the mean manifest sphere and MRSE versus baseline were noted at all visits (P < .001), with a mean change of 0.99 ± 0.47 diopter (D) and 0.97 ± 0.48 D, respectively, by 6 months postoperatively. Significant reductions in corneal curvature versus baseline occurred at all follow-up visits (all P < .05). At 1 month, there were no significant changes in the endothelial cell density (P = .282) or number of cells (P = .069). No safety issues or complications were reported.
CONCLUSION
The findings show that patterned CXL using a custom CXL system is safe and effective for reducing myopic refractive error.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.