MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/0002-9149(81)90397-0

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of cardiology · 1981

Noninvasive methods for detection of valve vegetations in infective endocarditis.

Melvin E T, Berger M, Lutzker L G, Goldberg E, Mildvan D

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

To determine the optimal noninvasive method for the demonstration of endocarditic vegetations, 35 consecutive episodes of clinically diagnosed endocarditis in 33 patients were studied with M mode and two dimensional echocardiography, and with gallium-67 citrate and technetium-99m stannous pyrophosphate cardiac scanning. Clinical criteria for the diagnosis of endocarditis were: temperature higher than 38 degrees C; sustained bacteremia with at least three positive blood cultures; no extracardiac focus of bacteremia; and known underlying heart disease, a new or changing murmur or a history of intravenous drug abuse with radiologic evidence of septic pulmonary emboli. M mode echocardiography detected 18 vegetations in 17 of the 35 episodes of endocarditis studied (49 percent positive); two dimensional echocardiography detected 30 vegetations in 28 of the 35 episodes studied (80 percent positive). In contrast, no vegetations were detected with technetium-99m stannous pyrophosphate scanning,, and only two gallium-67 citrate scans were positive. The advantage of the two dimensional echocardiographic technique over all others tested was particularly notable for the identification of aortic and tricuspid valve vegetations.

Для цитирования: Melvin E T, Berger M, Lutzker L G, Goldberg E, Mildvan D. Noninvasive methods for detection of valve vegetations in infective endocarditis.. The American journal of cardiology. 1981. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(81)90397-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.