MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10897-008-9152-5

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of genetic counseling · 2008

A qualitative description of receiving a diagnosis of clefting in the prenatal or postnatal period.

Nusbaum Rachel, Grubs Robin E, Losee Joseph E, Weidman Carla, Ford Matthew D, Marazita Mary L

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

This study investigated the experience of receiving a diagnosis of clefting in the prenatal or postnatal period. Open-ended interviews were conducted with 20 parents of children with cleft lip with or without cleft palate. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using a qualitative descriptive approach with an emphasis on thematic analysis. Common themes emerged from participants' responses regarding the delivery of the diagnosis, preparation for the birth of their child, advantages and disadvantages of prenatal diagnosis, use of the Internet, views on abortion and genetic testing, among other issues. All participants in the prenatal group indicated they were satisfied they learned of the cleft before the birth of their child. Some participants in the postnatal group would rather have received the diagnosis prenatally, while others were content with learning of the diagnosis in the delivery room. Greater awareness of the parental experience of the timing of receiving a cleft diagnosis may assist health care professionals in providing care for these families.

Для цитирования: Nusbaum Rachel, Grubs Robin E, Losee Joseph E, Weidman Carla, Ford Matthew D, Marazita Mary L. A qualitative description of receiving a diagnosis of clefting in the prenatal or postnatal period.. Journal of genetic counseling. 2008. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-008-9152-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.