MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5021/ad.2016.28.5.569

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of dermatology · 2016

A Comparative Study of Oral Cyclosporine and Betamethasone Minipulse Therapy in the Treatment of Alopecia Areata.

Jang Yong Hyun, Kim Sang Lim, Lee Kyou Chae, Kim Min Ji, Park Kyung Hea, Lee Weon Ju, Lee Seok-Jong, Kim Do Won

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Various systemic agents have been assessed for the treatment of alopecia areata (AA); however, there is a paucity of comparative studies.

OBJECTIVE

To assess and compare cyclosporine and betamethasone minipulse therapy as treatments for AA with regard to effectiveness and safety.

METHODS

Data were collected from 88 patients who received at least 3 months of oral cyclosporine (n=51) or betamethasone minipulse therapy (n=37) for AA. Patients with ≥50% of terminal hair regrowth in the alopecic area were considered responders.

RESULTS

The responder of the cyclosporine group was 54.9% and that of the betamethasone minipulse group was 37.8%. In the cyclosporine group, patients with mild AA were found to respond better to the treatment. Based on the patient self-assessments, 70.6% of patients in the cyclosporine group and 43.2% of patients in the betamethasone minipulse group rated their hair regrowth as excellent or good. Side effects were less frequent in the cyclosporine group.

CONCLUSION

Oral cyclosporine appeared to be superior to betamethasone minipulse therapy in terms of treatment effectiveness and safety.

Для цитирования: Jang Yong Hyun, Kim Sang Lim, Lee Kyou Chae, Kim Min Ji, Park Kyung Hea, Lee Weon Ju, Lee Seok-Jong, Kim Do Won. A Comparative Study of Oral Cyclosporine and Betamethasone Minipulse Therapy in the Treatment of Alopecia Areata.. Annals of dermatology. 2016. DOI: 10.5021/ad.2016.28.5.569.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.