European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2019
Gusher in stapes surgery: a systematic review.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alicandri-Ciufelli Matteo, Molinari Giulia, Rosa Maria Silvia, Monzani Daniele, Presutti Livio
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to perform a systematic literature review on the occurrence of gusher during stapes surgery, to understand its surgical management and outcomes.
METHODS: The PRISMA standard was applied to identify English, Italian or French-language studies, related to stapes surgery and mentioning gusher or perilymphatic leak. Full-texts lacking information on the management of gusher and/or the post-operative hearing outcome were excluded.
RESULTS: Twenty-four articles were eventually included. Seventy-six patients were involved in the qualitative synthesis. The management of gusher mostly consisted in covering the oval window and/or filling the tympanic cavity, with absorbable and autologous graft materials. Packing of the external auditory canal was reported in 51 patients (67%). Gusher was related to complete/profound loss of hearing in 25% of the cases and to a worsening of hearing function in 31% of patients. In 19% of patients an improvement in hearing tests was reported; in 28% the hearing function was unchanged. Post-operative vestibular symptoms were reported in 7 patients, and were mainly mild and transient. The absence of vestibular symptoms was underlined in 9 cases, while in 79% of the patients the authors did not provide information.
CONCLUSION: The unexpected occurrence of gusher during stapes surgery represents a relevant issue for the otologic surgeon. Its management most commonly consists in plugging the oval window and the tympanic cavity. In most of the cases, a stapes prosthesis could be positioned. The results on hearing and vestibular functions are widely variable.
METHODS: The PRISMA standard was applied to identify English, Italian or French-language studies, related to stapes surgery and mentioning gusher or perilymphatic leak. Full-texts lacking information on the management of gusher and/or the post-operative hearing outcome were excluded.
RESULTS: Twenty-four articles were eventually included. Seventy-six patients were involved in the qualitative synthesis. The management of gusher mostly consisted in covering the oval window and/or filling the tympanic cavity, with absorbable and autologous graft materials. Packing of the external auditory canal was reported in 51 patients (67%). Gusher was related to complete/profound loss of hearing in 25% of the cases and to a worsening of hearing function in 31% of patients. In 19% of patients an improvement in hearing tests was reported; in 28% the hearing function was unchanged. Post-operative vestibular symptoms were reported in 7 patients, and were mainly mild and transient. The absence of vestibular symptoms was underlined in 9 cases, while in 79% of the patients the authors did not provide information.
CONCLUSION: The unexpected occurrence of gusher during stapes surgery represents a relevant issue for the otologic surgeon. Its management most commonly consists in plugging the oval window and the tympanic cavity. In most of the cases, a stapes prosthesis could be positioned. The results on hearing and vestibular functions are widely variable.