MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jocd.12224

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2016

Assessment of vitamin D receptors in alopecia areata and androgenetic alopecia.

Fawzi Marwa M T, Mahmoud Sara Bahaa, Ahmed Shereen Fathi, Shaker Olfat Gamil

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is a frequent autoimmune disease, the pathogenesis of which is still unknown. Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is a noncicatricial type of patterned hair loss. Expression of vitamin D receptors (VDRs) on keratinocytes is essential for maintenance of normal hair cycle, especially anagen initiation.

OBJECTIVE

To assess VDRs in the skin and blood of AA and AGA patients, in order to evaluate their possible role in these hair diseases.

METHODS

This study recruited 20 patients with AA, 20 patients with AGA, and 20 healthy controls. Blood samples and lesional scalp biopsies were taken from all participants for detection of VDR levels.

RESULTS

Serum and tissue VDR levels were lower in AA as well as AGA patients when compared to controls (P = 0.000). Serum and tissue VDR were positively correlated in each group. Tissue VDR was significantly lower in female patients with AA than males (P = 0.046) although serum and tissue VDR levels were significantly higher in female AGA patients than males (P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

This study suggests an important role for VDR in the pathogenesis of AA and AGA through documenting lower serum and tissue VDR levels in AA and AGA patients in comparison with controls.

Для цитирования: Fawzi Marwa M T, Mahmoud Sara Bahaa, Ahmed Shereen Fathi, Shaker Olfat Gamil. Assessment of vitamin D receptors in alopecia areata and androgenetic alopecia.. Journal of cosmetic dermatology. 2016. DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12224.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.