Combined endovascular therapy and surgery for central giant cell granuloma in the temporal bone: A case report.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) is an uncommon, benign intraosseous lesion that most frequently occurs in the mandible and maxilla.
CASE DESCRIPTION: A 31-year-old female with a medical history of Kawasaki disease presented to our hospital complaining of a clogged right ear. Head computed tomography revealed a mass in the squamous part of the right temporal bone, with osteolytic changes and invasion of the external auditory canal, middle ear, temporomandibular joint, and mastoid air cells. Enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a strong signal in the intraosseous lesion. Digital subtraction angiography revealed tumor staining from multiple feeders, including the middle meningeal, posterior deep temporal, and posterior auricular arteries. Preoperative feeder embolization using a detachable coil and Embosphere Microspheres were performed for the middle meningeal artery under general anesthesia. After the endovascular treatment, we operated on the temporal bone lesion. Postoperative enhanced MRI showed subtotal resection and residual tumor near the external auditory canal, which was left in place to prevent opening the external auditory canal. The histopathological examination showed proliferation of mononuclear cells intermingled with osteoclast-like multinucleated giant cells. A diagnosis of CGCG was made. The postoperative course was uncomplicated, and the patient was discharged on day 10 of hospitalization.
CONCLUSION
We reported a rare case of CGCG in the temporal bone, managed by endovascular therapy and surgical resection. This combination therapy resulted in subtotal resection, preserving surrounding normal structures, such as the external auditory canal and tympanic cavity.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.