MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00330-017-5280-3

Медицинская библиотека · European radiology · 2018

Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts.

van Zelst Jan C M, Tan Tao, Clauser Paola, Domingo Angels, Dorrius Monique D, Drieling Daniel, Golatta Michael, Gras Francisca, de Jong Mathijn, Pijnappel Ruud, Rutten Matthieu J C M, Karssemeijer Nico, Mann Ritse M

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of computer-aided-detection (CAD) software for automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) on reading time (RT) and performance in screening for breast cancer.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

Unilateral ABUS examinations of 120 women with dense breasts were randomly selected from a multi-institutional archive of cases including 30 malignant (20/30 mammography-occult), 30 benign, and 60 normal cases with histopathological verification or ≥ 2 years of negative follow-up. Eight radiologists read once with (CAD-ABUS) and once without CAD (ABUS) with > 8 weeks between reading sessions. Readers provided a BI-RADS score and a level of suspiciousness (0-100). RT, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and area under the curve (AUC) were compared.

RESULTS

Average RT was significantly shorter using CAD-ABUS (133.4 s/case, 95% CI 129.2-137.6) compared with ABUS (158.3 s/case, 95% CI 153.0-163.3) (p < 0.001). Sensitivity was 0.84 for CAD-ABUS (95% CI 0.79-0.89) and ABUS (95% CI 0.78-0.88) (p = 0.90). Three out of eight readers showed significantly higher specificity using CAD. Pooled specificity (0.71, 95% CI 0.68-0.75 vs. 0.67, 95% CI 0.64-0.70, p = 0.08) and PPV (0.50, 95% CI 0.45-0.55 vs. 0.44, 95% CI 0.39-0.49, p = 0.07) were higher in CAD-ABUS vs. ABUS, respectively, albeit not significantly. Pooled AUC for CAD-ABUS was comparable with ABUS (0.82 vs. 0.83, p = 0.53, respectively).

CONCLUSION

CAD software for ABUS may decrease the time needed to screen for breast cancer without compromising the screening performance of radiologists.

KEY POINTS: • ABUS with CAD software may speed up reading time without compromising radiologists' accuracy. • CAD software for ABUS might prevent non-detection of malignant breast lesions by radiologists. • Radiologists reading ABUS with CAD software might improve their specificity without losing sensitivity.

Для цитирования: van Zelst Jan C M, Tan Tao, Clauser Paola, Domingo Angels, Dorrius Monique D, Drieling Daniel, Golatta Michael, Gras Francisca, de Jong Mathijn, Pijnappel Ruud, Rutten Matthieu J C M, Karssemeijer Nico, Mann Ritse M. Dedicated computer-aided detection software for automated 3D breast ultrasound; an efficient tool for the radiologist in supplemental screening of women with dense breasts.. European radiology. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5280-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.