MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5543/tkda.2020.00015

Медицинская библиотека · Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir · 2020

Successful dilatation of underexpanded stent with super-high-pressure balloon: A case report.

Jamakovic Mesud, Aganovic Kenana, Begic Edin

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Dilatation and percutaneous coronary intervention in the presence of calcified lesions is particularly demanding and presents a challenge in the daily work of an interventional cardiologist. Coronary calcification is a marker of the progress of the atherosclerotic process. The existence of calcifying lesions predicts a poorer clinical outcome and is associated with increased mortality and the occurrence of postprocedural major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). A male patient who was 61 years old was admitted as a result of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated by cardiac arrest caused by in-stent thrombosis of a previously suboptimally expanded stent. The lesion did not respond to a dilation attempt with a noncompliant (NC) balloon; however, an optimal result was obtained with inflation from a super-high-pressure NC balloon (OPN NC) for ultra-high-pressure inflations. Resistant, calcified lesions require a careful and comprehensive approach. The OPN NC balloon has a place in the treatment of this type of lesion. An optimized therapeutic modality after the procedure is imperative to prevent a MACE.

Для цитирования: Jamakovic Mesud, Aganovic Kenana, Begic Edin. Successful dilatation of underexpanded stent with super-high-pressure balloon: A case report.. Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir. 2020. DOI: 10.5543/tkda.2020.00015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.