DOI 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104242
Subjective cognitive decline and elder mistreatment in Mexican community-dwelling older adults.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVES
Elder mistreatment in individuals with subjective cognitive decline is an understudied public health problem that violates human rights.
DESIGN AND
METHODS
Cross-sectional study of 386 Mexican community-dwelling older adults. Individuals with episodic memory, executive function, language, visuospatial skills or attention cognitive complaints without low cognitive performance scores in the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Isaacs Set Test that were considered positive for subjective cognitive decline (SCD). Elder mistreatment (EM) was considered positive if any of the questions on the Geriatric Mistreatment Scale were answered affirmatively. Logistic regression models were created to test the association between SCD and EM.
RESULTS
After adjustments made by age, sex, education and depressive symptoms a positive association was found between SCD and EM (OR = 2.226; 95%CI = 1.296 to 3.822 ; p = 0.004). This association was observed in all subtypes of cognitive complaints except excecutive function: episodic memory (OR = 2.219 ; 95%CI = 1.321 to 3.728 ; p = 0.003), language (OR = 2.500 ; 95% CI = 1.422 to 4.396 ; p = 0.001), visuospatial (OR = 2.158 ; 95%CI = 1.162 to 4.007 ; p = 0.015), attention (OR = 2.197 ; 95%CI = 1.206 to 4.001 ; p = 0.010) and executive (OR = 1 2.062 ; 95%CI = 0.981 to 4.333 ; p = 0.056). Discussion and Implications: This study brings to light the relation between SCD and EM in a population where it has been understudied. Exploring mistreatment in older adults who experience subjective cognitive decline might help preserve their safety and create future prevention and intervention strategies.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.