Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2021
Neuropilin-2 regulates airway inflammation in a neutrophilic asthma model.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Immormino Robert M, Jania Corey M, Tilley Stephen L, Moran Timothy P
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Asthma is a heterogenous disease that can be classified into eosinophilic (type 2-high) and noneosinophilic (type 2-low) endotypes. The type 2-low endotype of asthma can be characterized by the presence of neutrophilic airway inflammation that is poorly responsive to corticosteroids. Dysregulated innate immune responses to microbial products including Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands have been associated with the pathogenesis of neutrophilic asthma. The key molecules that regulate inflammatory responses in individuals with neutrophilic asthma remain unclear. We previously reported that the immunoregulatory receptor neuropilin-2 (NRP2) is expressed by murine and human alveolar macrophage (AM) and suppresses lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced neutrophilic airway inflammation.
METHODS: Here, we investigated the immunoregulatory role of NRP2 in a mouse model of neutrophilic asthma.
RESULTS: We found that TLR ligands, but not T helper 2 (Th2)-promoting adjuvants, induced NRP2 expression by AM. Using an LPS-mediated model of neutrophilic asthma, we demonstrate that NRP2 was increased in AM and other lung antigen-presenting cells following airway challenge with antigen. Conditional deletion of NRP2 in myeloid cells exacerbated airway inflammation in a neutrophilic asthma model. In contrast, myeloid-specific ablation of NRP2 did not affect airway inflammation in a Th2-mediated eosinophilic asthma model. Myeloid-specific ablation of NRP2 did not affect Th1/Th17 responses to inhaled antigens or expression of neutrophil chemokines but rather resulted in impaired efferocytosis by AM, which is necessary for effective resolution of airway inflammation.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that NRP2 is a negative regulator of airway inflammation associated with neutrophilic asthma.
METHODS: Here, we investigated the immunoregulatory role of NRP2 in a mouse model of neutrophilic asthma.
RESULTS: We found that TLR ligands, but not T helper 2 (Th2)-promoting adjuvants, induced NRP2 expression by AM. Using an LPS-mediated model of neutrophilic asthma, we demonstrate that NRP2 was increased in AM and other lung antigen-presenting cells following airway challenge with antigen. Conditional deletion of NRP2 in myeloid cells exacerbated airway inflammation in a neutrophilic asthma model. In contrast, myeloid-specific ablation of NRP2 did not affect airway inflammation in a Th2-mediated eosinophilic asthma model. Myeloid-specific ablation of NRP2 did not affect Th1/Th17 responses to inhaled antigens or expression of neutrophil chemokines but rather resulted in impaired efferocytosis by AM, which is necessary for effective resolution of airway inflammation.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that NRP2 is a negative regulator of airway inflammation associated with neutrophilic asthma.