MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/alp.37.1.34.40

Медицинская библиотека · Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery · 2003

Aesthetic considerations in the cervicofacial management of Madelung syndrome.

Wong David S Y, Lam Lai K, Chung Joseph H P, Ng Raymond W M, Li George K H, Chan Vana S H

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The most common concern in patients with Madelung syndrome who are seeking cosmetic improvement is the deposition of fat in the cervicofacial region. Surgical experience in a series of 15 patients was summarised to provide guidelines for a rational approach to a better aesthetic outcome. The records and clinical photographs of these patients were reviewed. Outcome was assessed in terms of adequacy of debulking, final overall symmetry, smoothness of contour, prominence of scar, and necessity for multiple sessions. Open excision was the preferred primary treatment. A long mid-neck, transverse skin crease incision provided good exposure and was superior to multiple local incisions. Other surgical details worth noting include subplatysmal dissection, thick skin flaps, dissection around instead of into lipomas, appropriate removal of redundant skin, adequate reduction of tumour size instead of total excision, haemostasis, suction drainage, and layered skin closure. Liposuction was a useful adjunct for contouring the sides of the jaws in selected patients.

Для цитирования: Wong David S Y, Lam Lai K, Chung Joseph H P, Ng Raymond W M, Li George K H, Chan Vana S H. Aesthetic considerations in the cervicofacial management of Madelung syndrome.. Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery. 2003. DOI: 10.1080/alp.37.1.34.40.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.