MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11883-025-01326-7

Медицинская библиотека · Current atherosclerosis reports · 2025

Renal Denervation for Hypertension: Current Evidence and Clinical Perspectives.

Li Jason, Chiang Joey, Bockus Lee, Yang Eugene

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes current literature on the diagnosis and treatment of hypertension, highlights persistent disparities in care, and critically evaluates recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of renal denervation (RDN) to clarify its emerging role in hypertension management.

RECENT FINDINGS: Despite decades of therapeutic advances, progress in hypertension control has plateaued, with significant under-treatment contributing to ongoing cardiovascular disease, particularly among women and minority populations. Given the limitations of pharmacologic therapy alone, there is growing interest in alternative, procedure-based strategies. RDN, using both radiofrequency and ultrasound modalities, has shown promise in recent RCTs as an adjunctive treatment option. Hypertension remains a leading cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, with persistently poor control rates in high-risk groups despite available therapies. RDN has demonstrated efficacy in reducing blood pressure and is being integrated into clinical practice guidelines. However, its long-term impact, safety, and effectiveness in diverse and historically underrepresented populations require further study to ensure equitable implementation.

Для цитирования: Li Jason, Chiang Joey, Bockus Lee, Yang Eugene. Renal Denervation for Hypertension: Current Evidence and Clinical Perspectives.. Current atherosclerosis reports. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s11883-025-01326-7.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.