MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf02409052

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of surgical oncology · 1996

Interpretation of the risk associated with the unexpected finding of lobular carcinoma in situ.

Zurrida S, Bartoli C, Galimberti V, Raselli R, Barletta L

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The risk of developing invasive breast cancer after finding lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is controversially reported in the literature. The surgeon who finds LCIS unexpectedly may be tempted to remove the breast, or even remove both breasts.

METHODS

From 1976 to 1991, 157 consecutive women with palpable or mammographically detected breast lesions underwent surgery to resolve doubt as to the presence of invasive cancer. We report on the women in whom LCIS was found after diagnostic breast surgery and analyze the incidence of breast cancer after a mean 5 years of follow-up in comparison with that in the normal reference population.

RESULTS

Eight patients developed infiltrating breast carcinoma (four ipsilateral, four contralateral as first events), equal to a homolateral rate of 0.00625. The expected rate in the normal reference population is 0.00152; ratio 4.11 (95% confidence interval 1.1-10.5). For a contralateral event the rate ratio is 3.0 (95% confidence interval 0.8-7.6).

CONCLUSION

LCIS is one of many markers for later infiltrating cancer, so patients should be carefully followed. Ablative surgery is not justified.

Для цитирования: Zurrida S, Bartoli C, Galimberti V, Raselli R, Barletta L. Interpretation of the risk associated with the unexpected finding of lobular carcinoma in situ.. Annals of surgical oncology. 1996. DOI: 10.1007/bf02409052.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.