European journal of radiology · 2021
Treatment of meralgia paresthetica (Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Neuropathy): A meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided injection versus surgery.
СтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tagliafico Alberto Stefano, Torri Lorenzo, Signori Alessio
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare ultrasound (US)-guided injections and surgery for the treatment of meralgia paresthetica (lateral femoral cutaneous neuropathy).
METHODS: Two reviewers, independently, up to 10 October 2020 retrieved Studies that assessed the outcome of US-guided injections and surgery for the treatment of meralgia paresthetica from major medical libraries. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were adopted.
RESULTS: 399 studies were initially found, and the meta-analysis was conducted on 10 studies for a total of 149 patients. US-guided injections were done in three studies, surgery in seven studies. N = 38 % (57/149) of patients were treated with US-guided injection and 62 % (92/149) were treated with surgery. After US-guided injections, 85 % (49/57) of patients were treated successfully, whereas 80 % (74/92) were treated with surgery successfully from the clinical point of view. Differences were not statistically significant even with a slight heterogeneity of studies and outcome pooled on random-effect model. No comparative cohort study or RCT was conducted.
CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in treatment of meralgia paresthetica with ultrasound-guided injection or surgery. A RCT to compare a standardized US-guided approach versus surgery is essential to compare these techniques properly.
METHODS: Two reviewers, independently, up to 10 October 2020 retrieved Studies that assessed the outcome of US-guided injections and surgery for the treatment of meralgia paresthetica from major medical libraries. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were adopted.
RESULTS: 399 studies were initially found, and the meta-analysis was conducted on 10 studies for a total of 149 patients. US-guided injections were done in three studies, surgery in seven studies. N = 38 % (57/149) of patients were treated with US-guided injection and 62 % (92/149) were treated with surgery. After US-guided injections, 85 % (49/57) of patients were treated successfully, whereas 80 % (74/92) were treated with surgery successfully from the clinical point of view. Differences were not statistically significant even with a slight heterogeneity of studies and outcome pooled on random-effect model. No comparative cohort study or RCT was conducted.
CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference in treatment of meralgia paresthetica with ultrasound-guided injection or surgery. A RCT to compare a standardized US-guided approach versus surgery is essential to compare these techniques properly.