AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2007
Underestimation of DCIS at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lee Jung-min, Kaplan Jennifer B, Murray Melissa P, Mazur-Grbec Marzena, Tadic Tade, Stimac Damir, Liberman Laura
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to assess the rate of underestimation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective review was performed of 373 consecutive lesions that had undergone MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. In 34 lesions with subsequent surgery, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy yielded DCIS without frank microinvasion or invasion. DCIS underestimates were lesions for which vacuum-assisted breast biopsy yielded DCIS without frank microinvasion or invasion at biopsy and surgery yielded invasive cancer. Records and pathology findings were reviewed.
RESULTS: Among 34 lesions, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy histology was DCIS in 29 and DCIS with possible microinvasion in five. Of 29 lesions yielding DCIS at MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, surgical excision revealed invasive cancer in five (17%; 95% CI, 6-36%). The DCIS underestimation rate was significantly higher in lesions 6 cm or larger versus smaller lesions (60% vs 8%, p = 0.02). MRI lesion type, kinetics, number of specimens, menopausal status, and target sampling versus excision did not significantly affect underestimation. Of five lesions yielding DCIS with possible microinvasion at MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, surgery revealed invasive carcinoma in four (80%; 95% CI, 28-99%). DCIS underestimation was significantly more likely if MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsy showed possible microinvasion than if it did not (80% vs 17%, p =0.01).
CONCLUSION: Underestimation occurred in 17% of lesions yielding DCIS and in 80% of lesions yielding DCIS with possible microinvasion at MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. DCIS underestimation was significantly more likely in lesions measuring 6 cm or larger. No other patient or lesion factors significantly affected DCIS underestimation at MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective review was performed of 373 consecutive lesions that had undergone MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. In 34 lesions with subsequent surgery, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy yielded DCIS without frank microinvasion or invasion. DCIS underestimates were lesions for which vacuum-assisted breast biopsy yielded DCIS without frank microinvasion or invasion at biopsy and surgery yielded invasive cancer. Records and pathology findings were reviewed.
RESULTS: Among 34 lesions, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy histology was DCIS in 29 and DCIS with possible microinvasion in five. Of 29 lesions yielding DCIS at MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, surgical excision revealed invasive cancer in five (17%; 95% CI, 6-36%). The DCIS underestimation rate was significantly higher in lesions 6 cm or larger versus smaller lesions (60% vs 8%, p = 0.02). MRI lesion type, kinetics, number of specimens, menopausal status, and target sampling versus excision did not significantly affect underestimation. Of five lesions yielding DCIS with possible microinvasion at MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsy, surgery revealed invasive carcinoma in four (80%; 95% CI, 28-99%). DCIS underestimation was significantly more likely if MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsy showed possible microinvasion than if it did not (80% vs 17%, p =0.01).
CONCLUSION: Underestimation occurred in 17% of lesions yielding DCIS and in 80% of lesions yielding DCIS with possible microinvasion at MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. DCIS underestimation was significantly more likely in lesions measuring 6 cm or larger. No other patient or lesion factors significantly affected DCIS underestimation at MRI vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.