MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1037/per0000691

Медицинская библиотека · Personality disorders · 2024

Head-to-head comparisons of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, Section II and Section III personality disorder in predicting clinical outcomes.

Sharp Carla, Miller Joshua D

Introductory Journal ArticleСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

In 2022, PDs: Theory, Research, and Treatment published a 10-year retrospective on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5), Section III, Alternative Model for PDs (AMPD; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). The articles of the 10-year retrospective provided evidence in support of the validity, reliability, and clinical utility of the AMPD. Specifically, it provided evidence in support of the unidimensional factor structure of the LPF and the five-dimensional structure of the pathological trait domains. In addition, evidence in support of the construct validity of the LPF in its association with psychiatric severity, functional outcomes, traditional PDs, cognitive, emotional, and contextual correlates, and other indices of maladaptive self- and interpersonal functioning was provided. Despite this evidence, a significant gap has since been identified related to how the American Psychiatric Association (APA) decides to accept proposed revisions to diagnostic criteria. The goal of the current special issue is to address this gap. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

Для цитирования: Sharp Carla, Miller Joshua D. Head-to-head comparisons of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition, Section II and Section III personality disorder in predicting clinical outcomes.. Personality disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1037/per0000691.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.