MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.xfss.2024.05.002

Медицинская библиотека · F&S science · 2024

Donor side effects experienced under minimal controlled ovarian stimulation with in vitro maturation vs. conventional controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization treatment.

Marchante Maria, Barrachina Ferran, Piechota Sabrina, Fernandez-González Marta, Giovannini Alexa, Smith Trozalla, Kats Simone, Paulsen Bruna, González Eva, Calvente Virginia, Silvan Ana, Abittan Baruch, Klein Joshua, Klatsky Peter, Ordonez Daniel, Kramme Christian C

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate oocyte retrieval experiences and side effects under minimally controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) treatment for in vitro maturation (IVM) of oocytes compared with conventional COS treatment.

DESIGN

A retrospective survey study.

SETTING

Clinical in vitro fertilization treatment center.

PATIENT(S): Data were collected from subjects undergoing minimal COS treatment (n = 110; 600-800 IU follicle-stimulating hormone) for IVM of oocytes and conventional COS treatment for egg donation (n = 48; 1,800-2,600 IU follicle-stimulating hormone) from April 2022 to November 2023.

INTERVENTION(S): Minimal and conventional COS treatments.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The most common side effects experienced during ovarian stimulation and after oocyte pick-up, satisfaction level, and the likelihood of recommending or repeating minimal or conventional COS. Statistical analysis included Mann-Whitney U test and χ2 tests, with a significance level.

RESULT(S): During minimal COS treatment, most subjects did not experience breast swelling (86%), pelvic or abdominal pain (76%), nausea or vomiting (96%), and bleeding (96%). After oocyte pick-up, the majority (75%) reported no pelvic or abdominal pain. The most common side effect was abdominal swelling (52%). Compared with conventional COS cycles, minimal COS subjects reported significantly less postretrieval pain, with 33% experiencing no pain (vs. 6%) and with a reduced severe level of pain (5% vs. 19%), leading to fewer subjects requiring pain medication (25% vs. 54%). Additionally, 85% of women were very satisfied with minimal stimulation treatment and would recommend or repeat the treatment.

CONCLUSION(S): Reducing the hormonal dose for ovarian stimulation has a beneficial effect on subjects, suggesting the combination of minimal COS treatment with IVM techniques is a well-tolerated alternative for women who cannot or do not wish to undergo conventionally controlled ovarian hyperstimulation treatment.

Для цитирования: Marchante Maria, Barrachina Ferran, Piechota Sabrina, Fernandez-González Marta, Giovannini Alexa, Smith Trozalla, Kats Simone, Paulsen Bruna, González Eva, Calvente Virginia, Silvan Ana, Abittan Baruch, Klein Joshua, Klatsky Peter, Ordonez Daniel, Kramme Christian C. Donor side effects experienced under minimal controlled ovarian stimulation with in vitro maturation vs. conventional controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization treatment.. F&S science. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfss.2024.05.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.