DOI 10.1097/ico.0000000000003766
Social Risk Factors Associated With Microbial Keratitis.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to identify social risk factors (SRFs) that affect microbial keratitis (MK) care using the Penchansky-Thomas (P-T) health care access framework.
METHODS
This combined retrospective and prospective cohort study recruited participants with newly diagnosed MK at an academic medical center. Participant demographic information and SRFs were collected using in-person interviews and chart review. SRFs were categorized into P-T framework domains. Primary analysis included proportion of participants reporting SRFs, distribution of reported SRFs, and demographic differences associated with SRFs using descriptive statistics, chi-square, and two-sample t tests. A subgroup analysis for participants who were lost to follow-up (LTFU) was performed.
RESULTS
A total of 100 participants with MK were included in this study. Of the 100 participants, 60.0% reported at least 1 SRF affecting care, 42.0% reported ≥2 SRFs, and 12.0% reported ≥4 SRFs; 40.0% had no SRFs. More SRFs were reported for participants with lower income versus those with higher income ($25,000-$50,000 vs. $51,000-$100,000, P = 0.0363); there were no other demographic differences between groups. The most reported SRF was distance to appointment (45.0%). Accessibility was the most reported P-T domain (49.0%). Participants with LTFU, compared with those not LTFU, had more SRFs (100% vs. 52.4%, P = 0.0001) and reported a greater median number of SRFs (3.0 vs. 1.0, P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
SRFs affected most patients with MK, most notably accessibility and affordability. Participants with lower income had more SRFs. SRFs are linked to patients being lost to follow-up care.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.