MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.004

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of emergency medicine · 2008

Annals of Emergency Medicine Journal Club. Out-of-hospital continuous positive airway pressure ventilation versus usual care in acute respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial.

Brywczynski Jeremy J, Barrett Tyler W, Schriger David L

КомментарийСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC: Application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for patients with acute respiratory distress reduces the need for tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. Case series have demonstrated CPAP's feasibility in out-of-hospital settings. WHAT QUESTION THIS STUDY ADDRESSED: Seventy-one out-of-hospital patients with severe respiratory distress, randomized to receive CPAP or usual care, were assessed to determine need for tracheal intubation and mortality. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS TO OUR KNOWLEDGE: Within the CPAP group, the rate of intubation was 30% less than the usual care group, and mortality was 20% lower. HOW THIS MIGHT CHANGE CLINICAL PRACTICE: Emergency medical services systems and their medical directors should consider making CPAP available as part of the treatment for out-of-hospital severe respiratory distress patients, particularly in systems with long transport times.

Для цитирования: Brywczynski Jeremy J, Barrett Tyler W, Schriger David L. Annals of Emergency Medicine Journal Club. Out-of-hospital continuous positive airway pressure ventilation versus usual care in acute respiratory failure: a randomized controlled trial.. Annals of emergency medicine. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.07.004.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.