Evaluation of balloon-occluded hepatic venography with carbon dioxide for portography and correlation between retrograde portogram and liver function in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Background/Aim: Hepatic venography with a positive-contrast medium has been reported as a method for evaluating liver disease. However, the contrast medium used in this method provides insufficient portal vein observation and may cause severe liver injuries. Carbon dioxide (CO(2)), a negative-contrast medium, may be able to depict the portal vein system with minimal hepatic toxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness and side-effects of balloon-occluded hepatic venography with CO(2) (CO(2) venography) and to evaluate the correlation between retrograde portogram and liver function in patients with cirrhosis. Subjects and methods: The subjects consisted of 23 biopsy-proven cirrhotic patients (male:female, 16:7; age, 58+/-12 years, range 34-80). The causes of cirrhosis were alcohol intake in ten, HCV infection in ten, HBV infection in one, primary biliary cirrhosis in one and Budd-Chiari syndrome in one. Of these patients, six were complicated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). CO(2) venography was performed with an occlusion balloon catheter, and 25 ml of CO(2) was infused. CO(2) portograms were scored as follows: 0, no visualization of portal veins; 1, visualization of peripheral portal branches; 2, unilateral first portal branch; 3, bilateral first portal branches; 4, main portal vein; 5, left gastric vein, superior mesenteric vein and splenic vein. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), cardiac functions, biochemical analysis, blood gas analysis and oxygen (O(2)) saturation monitoring were measured simultaneously. Arterio-portography was also performed. To evaluate the usefulness of CO(2) venography in patients with HCC accompanied by portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), three patients were also examined. Results: No significant changes in ALT, AST, O(2) saturation or blood gas data were observed after CO(2) venography. A statistically significant positive correlation was observed between CO(2) portogram scores and Child-Pugh scores (r=0.68, P=0.003). The correlations between CO(2) portogram scores and HVPG, and the forms of gastroesophageal varices in patients without PVTT and major shunts were not significant. The CO(2) portogram score was significantly higher in patients with alcoholic liver cirrhosis than in those with HCV-positive cirrhosis (P=0.04). Cavernous transformation and peripheral portal branches were demonstrated in patients with HCC accompanied by PVTT. These findings could not be observed by arterio-portography. Conclusion: CO(2) venography to obtain retrograde portogram is a safe and useful method for evaluating the portal vein system and liver function in patients with liver cirrhosis.