MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/13546805.2019.1606708

Медицинская библиотека · Cognitive neuropsychiatry · 2019

Investigating the jumping to conclusion bias in bipolar disorder.

Can Serdar Süleyman, Atagün Murat İlhan, Korkmaz Şükrü Alperen, Soykan Çağlar

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Hemsley and Garety described the "jumping to conclusions bias" in which patients with delusions may reach unreasonable results with insufficient information. In this study patients with bipolar disorder and healthy volunteers were compared in terms of jumping to conclusions bias using the beads in the jar task.

METHODS

37 patients with DSM-5 diagnosis of bipolar disorder and 30 healthy controls were tested with the Beads Task (BT), Tower of London Test (ToL) and Barrat Impulsiveness Scale (BIS).

RESULTS

In the BT, the mean score of DtD (draws to decision) and JTC (jumping to conclusions) scores were not statistically different between the two groups. In the ToL test, the duration of the total execution and the total time were significantly longer in the bipolar group than the control group. BIS scores were significantly higher in the bipolar group. YMRS (Young Mania Rating Scale) scores were not correlated with BT.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is the first clinical study to assess the jumping to conclusions bias in patients with bipolar disorder. No JTC bias was detected in bipolar disorder. Further studies may assess JTC in larger samples to determine the effects of clinical state changes, psychotic symptoms, medication and impulsivity.

Для цитирования: Can Serdar Süleyman, Atagün Murat İlhan, Korkmaz Şükrü Alperen, Soykan Çağlar. Investigating the jumping to conclusion bias in bipolar disorder.. Cognitive neuropsychiatry. 2019. DOI: 10.1080/13546805.2019.1606708.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.