Beneficial Outcomes of Immunoenhancing Nutritional Interventions in Perioperative Care for Oral Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of immunoenhancing nutritional therapy compared to conventional nutritional care in reducing perioperative complications in adult patients undergoing surgery for oral cancer. Given the unclear role of immunonutrition in this specific surgical setting, we synthesized available randomized controlled trials to assess outcomes such as surgical site infections, wound healing complications, hospital stay, and adverse events.

METHODS

Patients who underwent planned oral cancer surgery were included. The intervention group received oral or enteral immunoenhancing nutritional agents preoperatively, postoperatively, or both, while the control group received standard care (intravenous fluids) and/or macromolecular nutritional supplements. PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Central Medical Journal were comprehensively searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs); eight RCTs were included. The primary outcomes were mortality, suture/healing failure, surgical site infection (SSI), and hospital stay length, with evidence certainty assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

Although mortality estimation was not feasible, hazard ratios from the meta-analysis showed that the intervention significantly improved suture/healing failure, SSI, and hospital stay length. The certainty of evidence was "low" for suture/healing failure and SSI and "moderate" for hospital stay length.

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative management with enteral nutritional agents fortified with immunonutrients should be considered in adult patients scheduled for (advanced) oral cancer surgery.