MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s40211-018-0282-1

Медицинская библиотека · Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2018

[Coercive interventions: historical summary and review of subjective experience].

Edlinger Monika, Bader Tobias, Hofer Alex

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Psychiatric treatment has always been associated with violence and coercion. Involuntary admission and coercive measures are still frequently occurring components in everyday clinical practice.Up to 15% of psychiatric inpatients experience coercive treatment at least once during hospital stay. Particularly patients suffering from schizophrenia, organic mental disorders and mania have a high risk for such incidents.There is an ongoing intense debate on the need and justification of coercive measures, although most clinicians and scientists currently agree that there is no alternative. Several investigations have shown that seclusion and mechanical restraint go along with physical and psychological problems affecting both, patients and staff. However, it was possible to identify aspects that could be improved: Maintaining an objective and professional communication during coercive treatment seems just as important as making comprehensible decisions. Alternative treatment options should be focus of further investigations.

Для цитирования: Edlinger Monika, Bader Tobias, Hofer Alex. [Coercive interventions: historical summary and review of subjective experience].. Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s40211-018-0282-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.