Internal medicine journal · 2021
The application of telehealth to remote and rural Australians with chronic neurological conditions.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Le Sammy, Aggarwal Arun
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic disease in rural and remote regions endure limited access to specialised medicine. Telehealth has addressed this issue with demonstrable benefits such as a reduction in costs to patients.
AIMS: To explore the patient satisfaction of telehealth in Australia.
METHODS: Patients from all around Australia, including Queensland, Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia, Australian Capital Territory and even Western Australia were referred to a Sydney-based neurologist. After their initial face to face consultation, review consultations were performed by telehealth. All had chronic diseases (trigeminal neuralgia, facial pain or Parkinson disease) and received a standardised questionnaire comprising of demographics, satisfaction of technical aspects and quality of the consultation. The questionnaires were administered by the Practice Manager to remove observer bias.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patient questionnaires were completed by 13 patients who had follow-up telehealth consultations. One hundred per cent of patients reported satisfaction with the overall telehealth experience and would use it again. All were satisfied with the specialist and the privacy. The majority were satisfied with the voice quality (86%), visual quality (79%), ease of connectivity (93%) and length of the consultation (97%). In total, they saved nearly $17 000 in travel costs and on average, each patient avoided 937 km and saved $550.
CONCLUSION: Telehealth has proven to have multiple advantages, including improved access to healthcare, decreased costs, reduced inconvenience and improved management of chronic and complex conditions. The positive results advocate the use of telehealth for follow up of rural and remote patients with chronic disease.
AIMS: To explore the patient satisfaction of telehealth in Australia.
METHODS: Patients from all around Australia, including Queensland, Victoria, Tasmania, South Australia, Australian Capital Territory and even Western Australia were referred to a Sydney-based neurologist. After their initial face to face consultation, review consultations were performed by telehealth. All had chronic diseases (trigeminal neuralgia, facial pain or Parkinson disease) and received a standardised questionnaire comprising of demographics, satisfaction of technical aspects and quality of the consultation. The questionnaires were administered by the Practice Manager to remove observer bias.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patient questionnaires were completed by 13 patients who had follow-up telehealth consultations. One hundred per cent of patients reported satisfaction with the overall telehealth experience and would use it again. All were satisfied with the specialist and the privacy. The majority were satisfied with the voice quality (86%), visual quality (79%), ease of connectivity (93%) and length of the consultation (97%). In total, they saved nearly $17 000 in travel costs and on average, each patient avoided 937 km and saved $550.
CONCLUSION: Telehealth has proven to have multiple advantages, including improved access to healthcare, decreased costs, reduced inconvenience and improved management of chronic and complex conditions. The positive results advocate the use of telehealth for follow up of rural and remote patients with chronic disease.