Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) · 1999
Placement of a spring filter during interventional treatment of deep venous thrombosis to reduce the risk of pulmonary embolism.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hosaka J, Roy S, Kuroki K, Xian Z, Kvernebo K, Enge I, Laerum F
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of the Spring filter during interventional treatment of deep venous thrombosis in vivo.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A model of inferior vena cava thrombosis was used. Part I: The thrombus was treated by the pulse-spray technique (PT) (urokinase 250,000 IU; n=7) or a rotatory basket catheter, Thrombolizer (MT) (activated with compressed air at 7 atm; n=5). Part II: Following placement of a Spring filter, the animal underwent PT (n=5) or MT (n=5). Based on the results of part I, the treatment protocol was modified (PT, urokinase 500,000 IU; MT, compressed air at 8 atm). Embolus volumes trapped by the filter and found in the lungs were calculated and the filtering efficacy quantified.
RESULTS: Part I: Pulmonary emboli (1 to 4 mm in diameter) were observed in 3 animals in the PT group and 1 animal in the MT group, respectively. Median reduction in thrombus volume was 21% and 4% by PT and MT, respectively. Part II: In the PT group, 58% and 100% of the total embolus load was trapped in 2 animals, while the filter failed to trap emboli (1 to 1.5 mm in diameter) in 1 animal. In the remaining 2 animals, no embolus was found trapped by the filter or in the lungs. In the MT group, 55 97% (median 83%) of the embolus load was trapped. Emboli found in the lungs did not exceed 4 mm in diameter.
CONCLUSION: Preceding interventional treatment of venous thrombosis with placement of the Spring filter reduced the embolic burden on the lungs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A model of inferior vena cava thrombosis was used. Part I: The thrombus was treated by the pulse-spray technique (PT) (urokinase 250,000 IU; n=7) or a rotatory basket catheter, Thrombolizer (MT) (activated with compressed air at 7 atm; n=5). Part II: Following placement of a Spring filter, the animal underwent PT (n=5) or MT (n=5). Based on the results of part I, the treatment protocol was modified (PT, urokinase 500,000 IU; MT, compressed air at 8 atm). Embolus volumes trapped by the filter and found in the lungs were calculated and the filtering efficacy quantified.
RESULTS: Part I: Pulmonary emboli (1 to 4 mm in diameter) were observed in 3 animals in the PT group and 1 animal in the MT group, respectively. Median reduction in thrombus volume was 21% and 4% by PT and MT, respectively. Part II: In the PT group, 58% and 100% of the total embolus load was trapped in 2 animals, while the filter failed to trap emboli (1 to 1.5 mm in diameter) in 1 animal. In the remaining 2 animals, no embolus was found trapped by the filter or in the lungs. In the MT group, 55 97% (median 83%) of the embolus load was trapped. Emboli found in the lungs did not exceed 4 mm in diameter.
CONCLUSION: Preceding interventional treatment of venous thrombosis with placement of the Spring filter reduced the embolic burden on the lungs.