MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.brs.2026.103048

Медицинская библиотека · Brain stimulation · 2026

Patient-reported outcomes following accelerated vs. standard TMS with the H1 coil for major depression: A multisite randomized trial.

Tendler Aron, Roth Yiftach, Bates Mallory, Brink Eliza, Davis Molly, DeBrocco Dawn, Ellis Shelli, Jones Lindsey, Khan Aftab, Luce Spencer, McMillan Carlene, Mudunuru Aswin Kumar, Muir Owen, Pell Gabriel S, Prestley Timothy, Reddy M S, Rodriguez Noelia, Seplow Samson, Slomowitz Natanya, Stein Ahava, Thistlethwaite Daniel M, Voltin Russ, Williams Nancy, Hanlon Colleen A

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

Clinician-rated measures remain the gold standard in depression trials, but patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide essential insights into real-world experiences. This study compared PROs in patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) receiving either accelerated H1-coil Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (ACC-iTBS) or standard once-daily high-frequency H1-coil TMS (SOC-HF).

METHODS

In this randomized, multisite trial, 104 adults with moderate-to-severe MDD were assigned to ACC-iTBS (five sessions/day for six days, 50min intersession-interval, 50 Hz triplets, 5 Hz bursts frequency, 2s on, 8s off, 1800 pulses/session) or SOC-HF (daily sessions for four weeks, 18 Hz, 2s on 20s off, 1980 pulses/session), each followed by continuation treatment through week 6. PROs included the daily Clinically Useful Depression Outcome Scale (CUDOS-D), Clinically Useful Anxiety Outcome Scale (CUXOS-D), and the Quality-of-Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q). Outcomes assessed were response/remission rates, time to perceived improvement, and quality-of-life changes.

RESULTS

Both protocols produced significant and comparable improvements in depressive symptoms, anxiety, and quality-of-life. Week 6 CUDOS response/remission rates were 70.0%/57.5% (ACC-iTBS) and 75.6%/58.5% (SOC-HF); CUXOS rates were 70.0%/67.5% (ACC-iTBS) and 75.6%/69.0% (SOC-HF). Patients in the ACC-iTBS arm reported a shorter median time to CUDOS response (11 vs. 16 days, p = 0.0377). Anxiety improvements emerged early and were sustained across both groups. By week 6, severe quality-of-life impairment declined to 15-17%, compared with 85-100% at baseline. No significant between-group differences were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated TMS with the H1 coil provides patient-perceived benefits comparable to standard treatment while delivering faster relief of depressive symptoms. ACC-iTBS may represent a time-efficient, patient-centered alternative that improves accessibility and satisfaction for individuals with MDD.

Для цитирования: Tendler Aron, Roth Yiftach, Bates Mallory, Brink Eliza, Davis Molly, DeBrocco Dawn, Ellis Shelli, Jones Lindsey, Khan Aftab, Luce Spencer, McMillan Carlene, Mudunuru Aswin Kumar, Muir Owen, Pell Gabriel S, Prestley Timothy, Reddy M S, Rodriguez Noelia, Seplow Samson, Slomowitz Natanya, Stein Ahava, Thistlethwaite Daniel M, Voltin Russ, Williams Nancy, Hanlon Colleen A. Patient-reported outcomes following accelerated vs. standard TMS with the H1 coil for major depression: A multisite randomized trial.. Brain stimulation. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2026.103048.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.