MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1046/j.1365-4362.1999.00754.x

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of dermatology · 1999

Re-evaluation of the natural course of bullous pemphigoid. A prospective study.

Kyriakis K P, Paparizos V A, Panteleos D N, Tosca A D

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Few studies of prospectively collected data regarding the natural course of bullous pemphigoid have been performed.

METHODS

The following factors were combined both quantitatively and qualitatively to obtain results: gender, clinical activity based on the estimation of the body area involvement, disease duration, relapses, coexistence with other disease states, and serology Twenty-seven consecutive patients were followed up for 1 year.

RESULTS

Most disease activity (85.2%) is exhibited in the first year after onset. There is a lack of parameters with clear predictive significance. The extent and severity of skin involvement are equally distributed between the sexes and not affected by the disease duration. The generalized form of the disease is predominant (86.5%). The average clinical activity in relapses within the year of follow-up is 48% of the initially observed attack. The probability for recurrence is higher in seropositive patients (overall 37%). Coexistence with other disease states seems to be a random chance event.

CONCLUSIONS

The lack of parameters with predictive importance underlines the necessity of a thorough follow-up to prevent treatment-related complications in elderly patients.

Для цитирования: Kyriakis K P, Paparizos V A, Panteleos D N, Tosca A D. Re-evaluation of the natural course of bullous pemphigoid. A prospective study.. International journal of dermatology. 1999. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.1999.00754.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.