DOI 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_576_22
Sputum antibiogram in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Bacterial infections are the most common reason for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). This can range from self-limited disease to respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in survivors.
AIM: To ascertain common antibiotics effective in AECOPD using sputum bacterial culture and antibiotic susceptibility testing. Materials and
Methods
In the present cross-sectional observational study, we analysed the sputum antibiogram in 237 patients who had not received antibiotics in the past 48 hours. Statistical analysis was performed, and the χ2 test was used to determine the associations between categorical variables. A P value ≤0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
Of 237 sputum samples, 77.2% were mucoid in nature, followed by purulent and mucopurulent sputum in 16.9% and 5.9% of cases, respectively. In the purulent/mucopurulent samples, 85.2% showed positive growth on culture compared to 35% of mucoid samples. Cultures grew single pathogens in 108 cases, and 2 grew multiple pathogens; in 127 cases, no pathogenic organisms were isolated. In all, 41 (37.96%) isolates grew Gram-positive and 67 (62.04%) grew Gram-negative organisms. The most effective antibiotic against Gram-negative bacteria was imipenem (50%) and that against Gram-positive bacteria was vancomycin (70.59%). All isolates were resistant to ampicillin.
CONCLUSION
Sputum culture is a good and simple tool to study the aetiology and complications caused by bacteria in AECOPD. The antibiogram helps in identifying the correct treatment and timely initiation of appropriate antimicrobial therapy, thereby helping reduce mortality and morbidity.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.