MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.12.006

Медицинская библиотека · Neuroscience letters · 2017

Gender differences in anomalous subcortical morphology for children with ADHD.

Wang Yanpei, Xu Qinfang, Li Shuting, Li Gen, Zuo Chenyi, Liao Shuirong, Long Yang, Li Shan, Joshi R Malatesha

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Although studies showed subtle reductions in brain volume in fronto-striatial regions in children with ADHD, there have been limited investigations of volume and lateralizaton in subcortical structures and a paucity of exploration of the influence of gender on these findings. This study aims to examine morphology of subcortical structures and their association with ADHD symptoms in boys and girls as compared to their typically-developing (TD) peers. One hundred and eighty five children aged 7-14 years with and without ADHD were included from ADHD-200 Consortium. Results showed that compared to TD boys, boys with ADHD had reduced accumbens, amygdala and hippocampus volumes. There were no volumetric differences in any structure between ADHD and TD girls. Asymmetry analysis revealed right lateralization compressions within the thalamus in ADHD boys relative to TD boys. The findings suggest a gender dimorphic pattern of differences in subcortical structures in children with ADHD, and a possible neurobiological mechanism where boys with ADHD demonstrate increasing difficulties with hyperactivity/impulsivity.

Для цитирования: Wang Yanpei, Xu Qinfang, Li Shuting, Li Gen, Zuo Chenyi, Liao Shuirong, Long Yang, Li Shan, Joshi R Malatesha. Gender differences in anomalous subcortical morphology for children with ADHD.. Neuroscience letters. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.12.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.